We are six games into the 2016-17 basketball season, and already the Orange has already lost two games. While these two games came against No. 17 Wisconsin and South Carolina, a pair of BCS teams, it’s clear that Syracuse has a lot to work on as the season progresses.
This begs the question: How much of an indicator are early season losses to a team’s overall success? With this question in mind, I looked back in time at the previous 10 seasons to see how long it took for the team to pick up its second loss, and then compared it with its overall finish:
|Year||Games to Second Loss||End of season Result|
|2015-16||8||NCAA: Final 4|
|2013-14||27||NCAA: First Round|
|2012-13||20||NCAA: Final Four|
|2011-12||33||NCAA: Elite 8|
|2010-11||20||NCAA: Second Round|
|2009-10||26||NCAA: Sweet 16|
|2008-09||18||NCAA: Sweet 16|
So from this chart, there are a few conclusions you can draw:
- There does seem to be some kind of correlation from “games to second loss” to how the team fared that year. The obvious exception is the 2015-16 Final Four team, which surprised even the most optimistic of Syracuse fans. Otherwise, Syracuse’s NCAA Tournament teams all had double digit games before its second loss.
- What’s also concerning is that if you look at the past 10 seasons, there is only one other team that only played six games before its second loss, and that is the Jonny Flynn/Donte Greene team that ended up missing the tournament completely.
- I’m fairly certain the 2014-15 team without the self-imposed postseason ban would’ve been headed toward the NIT, as well. And they were at seven games, which is only one better than the current team.
- Stretching outside of this 10 year mark, there are two other important teams to note. The “2005-06 Gerry McNamara Big East Tournament Miracle Team” needed McNamara’s magic run to make the NCAA Tournament. That team was at five games before its second loss. The 2003 National Championship team needed 15 games, which once again is another successful SU team that had double-digit games before its first loss.
Will this season follow suit? Well, the answer is it’s too early to tell. But if past teams are a factor in your prediction, then perhaps this isn’t the team we’d all thought they’d be.
- Waters: 2017-18 Syracuse basketball has path to NCAA Tournament bid - October 18, 2017
- Instant Juice: Syracuse 27, Clemson 24 - October 13, 2017
- Experience with Syracuse basketball’s zone can be indicator of defensive efficiency - October 11, 2017
- 2017-18 Syracuse basketball: Best and worst case scenarios - October 5, 2017
- Does experience necessarily translate into wins for Syracuse basketball? - October 4, 2017
- Instant Juice: Syracuse 25, NC State 33 - September 30, 2017
- Instant Juice: Syracuse 26, LSU 35 - September 23, 2017
- Does Syracuse football have a puncher’s chance against LSU? - September 22, 2017
- What will Syracuse basketball’s starting lineup look like in 2017-18? - September 21, 2017
- Instant Juice: Syracuse 23, Middle Tennessee 30 - September 9, 2017